Brenda Richards

1961 -

• Name	Brenda Richards
  Birth	13 Jan 1961
  Gender	Female
  Person ID	I18876	Drollinger Genealogy
  Last Modified	1 Mar 2025

  
  

  Family	Dale Edward Rice,   b. 18 Dec 1959, IA d. 18 Aug 2011, Lincoln, Lancaster, NE (Age 51 years)
  Family ID	F6407	Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
  Last Modified	14 Mar 2016

  
  

• Notes

  Mylife.com - Mar 2025 Brenda Richards is 64 years old and was born on 01/13/1961. Brenda Richards lives in Lincoln, NE; previous city include Nebraska City NE. Other names that Brenda uses includes Brenda Kelch, Brenda R Rice, Brenda R Kelch, Brenda Richars Richards and Brenda Richards Kelch. We have lots of information about Brenda: religious views are listed as Christian, ethnicity is Caucasian, and political affiliation is unknown. We know that Brenda is married at this point. Brenda has many family members and associates who include Janice Frayser, Judith Philson, Kathryn Dostal, Stephen Frayser and Donna Maly. Attended Geneva Jr. High School https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ne-supreme-court/1733306.html Brenda R. Rice, Appellant, v. Terrance A. Poppe, an Individual, and Morrow, Poppe, Watermeier & Lonowski, P.C., a Limited Liability Organization, Appellees. No. S?15?528 Decided: April 28, 2016 HEAVICAN, C.J., WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, MILLER?LERMAN, and CASSEL, JJ. James R. Welsh and Christopher Welsh, of Welsh & Welsh, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Randall L. Goyette and Colin A. Mues, of Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt, L.L.P., for appellees. SUMMARY In 2011, the district court dissolved the marriage of Brenda R. Rice and Dale E. Rice. Attorney Terrance A. Poppe represented Brenda in the dissolution action. Later, Dale died and Brenda made a claim for the death benefits under life insurance policies owned by Dale. The court determined that Brenda was not entitled to the benefits, because she waived her beneficiary interest under the property settlement agreement. Brenda sued Poppe for legal malpractice, alleging that he had failed to advise her that the property settlement agreement waived her beneficiary interest in Dale's life insurance policies. The trial court sustained Poppe's motion for summary judgment, reasoning that Poppe had no duty to advise Brenda of the legal effect of an unambiguous agreement. We conclude that Poppe, the summary judgment movant, did not establish a prima facie case entitling him to judgment as a matter of law. We therefore reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.