Report: individuals with associated notes

         Description: personen met geassocieerde notities


Matches 11651 to 11700 of 49036  » Comma-delimited CSV file

«Prev «1 ... 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 ... 981» Next»

# Person ID Last Name First Name Birth Date Death Date Living note Tree
11651 I1591  Drollinger  Mildred Laura  31 Aug 1902  19 Mar 2001  Iowa, Delayed Birth Records
Name: Mildred Laura Drollinger
Gender: Female
Race: White
Birth Date: 31 Aug 1902
Birth Place: Jefferson Township, Lee, Iowa, USA
Father: Banjamin F Drollinger
Mother: Mary Bullard 
tree1 
11652 I1591  Drollinger  Mildred Laura  31 Aug 1902  19 Mar 2001  Social Security Death Index
Name: Mildred Corsbie
SSN: 479-20-5669
Last Residence: 52627 Fort Madison, Lee, Iowa, United States of America
Born: 31 Aug 1902
Died: 19 Mar 2001
State (Year) SSN issued: Iowa (Before 1951) 
tree1 
11653 I1591  Drollinger  Mildred Laura  31 Aug 1902  19 Mar 2001  Burial: Oakland Cemetery
Note: SECTION K
Fort Madison, Lee County, Iowa, USA

Inscription: Corsbie Mildred L. 1902-2001 Cleo C. 1902-1964 
tree1 
11654 I1591  Drollinger  Mildred Laura  31 Aug 1902  19 Mar 2001  1910 United States Federal Census
Name: Mildred L Drollinger
Age in 1910: 7
Birth Year: abt 1903
Birthplace: Iowa
Home in 1910: Jefferson, Lee, Iowa
Race: White
Gender: Female
Relation to Head of House: Daughter
Marital Status: Single
Father's name: Benjamin F Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Iowa
Mother's name: Mary A Drollinger
Mother's Birthplace: Iowa
Native Tongue: English
Attended School: Yes
Able to Read: Yes
Able to Write: Yes
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age
Benjamin F Drollinger 41
Mary A Drollinger 39
Lucret Drollinger 17
Pauline H Drollinger 13
Pearl B Drollinger 11
Mildred L Drollinger 7
Marion F Drollinger 4
Susan L Drollinger 76

1920 United States Federal Census
Name: B Frank Drollinger
Age: 50
Birth Year: abt 1870
Birthplace: Iowa
Home in 1920: Jefferson, Lee, Iowa
Race: White
Gender: Male
Relation to Head of House: Head
Marital status: Married
Spouse's Name: May Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Birthplace: Illinois
Occupation: Dairyman
Household Members:
Name Age
B Frank Drollinger 50
(Wife) May Drollinger 48 Iowa; Father born in Indiana, Mother born in Iowa
(Son) Pearl Drollinger 21 Iowa; Single; Occupation: Farmer
(Daughter) Mildred Drollinger 17 Iowa; Single
(Daughter) Marion Drollinger 15 Iowa

1930 United States Federal Census
Name: Mildred Corsbie
Birth Year: abt 1903
Gender: Female
Race: White
Birthplace: Iowa
Marital Status: Married
Relation to Head of House: Wife
Homemaker?: Yes
Home in 1930: Madison, Lee, Iowa, USA
Map of Home: View Map
Street address: Ave L
Ward of City: Fifth Part of
House Number: 3227
Dwelling Number: 253
Family Number: 275
Age at First Marriage: 24
Attended School: No
Able to Read and Write: Yes
Father's Birthplace: Iowa
Mother's Birthplace: Iowa
Able to Speak English: Yes
Household Members:
Name Age
Cleo C Corsbie 27
Mildred Corsbie 27

1940 United States Federal Census
Name: Mildred Corsbie
Age: 37
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1903
Gender: Female
Race: White
Birthplace: Iowa
Marital Status: Married
Relation to Head of House: Wife
Home in 1940: Fort Madison, Lee, Iowa
Map of Home in 1940: View Map
Street: Avenue L
House Number: 2706
Inferred Residence in 1935: Fort Madison, Lee, Iowa
Residence in 1935: Same House
Sheet Number: 4B
Attended School or College: No
Highest Grade Completed: Elementary school, 8th grade
Weeks Worked in 1939: 0
Income: 0
Income Other Sources: No
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age
Cleo C Corsbie 37
Mildred Corsbie 37
Paula Conlee 19
Eleanor Conlee 17
Nadine Peterson 10 
tree1 
11655 I11708  Drollinger  Mildred Louise  16 May 1899  21 Dec 1979  1930 United States Federal Census
about Howard Martin
Name: Howard Martin
[Howard Martus]
Gender: Male
Birth Year: abt 1898
Birthplace: Ohio
Race: White
Home in 1930: Marion, Marion, Ohio
Marital Status: Married
Relation to Head of House: Head
Spouse's Name: Mildred Martin
Father's Birthplace: Ohio
Mother's Birthplace: Ohio
Occupation: Electric Plant Laborer
Education:
Military service:
Rent/home value:
Age at first marriage: 21
Parents' birthplace:
View image
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members: Name Age
Howard Martin 32 Ohio
(Wife) Mildred Martin 30 Ohio; Father born in OH, Mother born in Grundstadt, Germany; Age at first marriage: 19
(Daughter) Mary K Martin 9 Ohio
(Daughter) Dorothy J Martin 4 [4 5/12] Ohio
(Note: Howard Martin and family was family number 204 and Louis M. Drollinger and family were family number 205 in this census)
(Some transcription provided by David H. Drollinger 26 Mar 2013)


1940 United States Federal Census about Howard Martin
Name: Howard Martin
Age: 42
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1898
Gender: Male
Race: White
Birthplace: Ohio
Marital Status: Married
Relation to Head of House: Head
Home in 1940: Marion, Marion, Ohio
Map of Home in 1940: View map
Street: Pearl Street
House Number: 504
Farm: No
Inferred Residence in 1935: Marion, Marion, Ohio
Residence in 1935: Same Place
Resident on farm in 1935: No
Sheet Number: 12A
Number of Household in Order of Visitation: 270
Occupation: Steam Shovel Helper
House Owned or Rented: Rented
Value of Home or Monthly Rental if Rented: 10
Attended School or College: No
Highest Grade Completed: Elementary school, 8th grade
Hours Worked Week Prior to Census: 40
Duration of Unemployment: 208
Class of Worker: Wage or salary worker in private work
Weeks Worked in 1939: 24
Income: 125
Income Other Sources: No
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age
Howard Martin 42
(Wife) Mildred Martin 40 Ohio
(Daughter) Dorothy Martin 15 Ohio 
tree1 
11656 I11708  Drollinger  Mildred Louise  16 May 1899  21 Dec 1979  Ohio, Births and Christenings Index
Name: Mildred L Drollinger
Gender: Female
Birth Place: Marion, Marion, Ohio
Birth Date: 16 May 1899
Father's Name: Louis Drollinger
Mother's Name: Julia Mitchel
FHL Film Number: 384336 
tree1 
11657 I11708  Drollinger  Mildred Louise  16 May 1899  21 Dec 1979  U.S., Newspapers.com Obituary Index
Name: Mildred Louise Martin
Maiden Name: Drollinger
Gender: Female
Death Age: 80
Birth Date: 16 May 1899
Birth Place: Marion
Marriage Date: 18 Jun 1919
Residence Place: 504 Pearl St.
Death Date: Abt 1979
Death Place: Delaware
Obituary Date: 21 Dec 1979
Obituary Place: Marion, Ohio, United States of America
Spouse: Howard E. Martin
Child: Dorothy Martin
Mary Cluff
Siblings:
Nell Drollinger
Florence Caldwell

Ohio, Death Records
Name: Mildred L Martin
Birth Date: 1899
Birth Place: Ohio, United States
Gender: Female
Race: White
Residence Place: Marion, Marion, Ohio, United States
Death Date: 21 Dec 1979
Hospital of Death: Long-Term Care Facilities
Death Place: Delaware, Delaware, Ohio, USA
Certificate: 086302
Age at Death: 80
Certifier: Physician
Social Security Number: 290-24-6241
Marital Status: Widowed 
tree1 
11658 I11708  Drollinger  Mildred Louise  16 May 1899  21 Dec 1979  Burial: Marion Cemetery
Marion, Marion County, Ohio 
tree1 
11659 I5918  Drollinger  Milton Othell  4 Apr 1902  30 Mar 1974  U.S. WWII Draft Cards Young Men, 1940-1947
Name: Milton Othell Drollinger
Race: White
Relationship to Draftee: Self (Head)
Birth Place: Payson, Utah, USA
Birth Date: 4 Apr 1902
Residence Place: Payson, Utah, Utah, USA
Employer: Self
Weight: 160
Complexion: Dark Brown
Eye Color: Blue
Hair Color: Brown
Height: 5 10
Next of Kin: Lucile Drollinger
Household Members:
Name Relationship
Milton Othell Drollinger Self (Head)

U.S. City Directories
Name: Milton O Drollinger
Gender: Male
Residence Year: 1935
Residence Place: Provo, Utah, USA
Occupation: Farmer
Spouse: Lucile B Drollinger
Publication Title: Provo, Utah, City Directory, 1935 
tree1 
11660 I5918  Drollinger  Milton Othell  4 Apr 1902  30 Mar 1974  U.S., Social Security Death Index
Name: Milton Drollinger
SSN: 528-50-8135
Last Residence:
84651 Payson, Utah, Utah, USA
BORN: 4 Apr 1902
Died: Mar 1974
State (Year) SSN issued: Utah (1955)

Utah County Obituary Index
DROLLINGER, Milton O.
Newspaper Date
1974-04-01
Newspaper
Provo Herald
Newspaper Page
BYU Microfilm Number
P94 
tree1 
11661 I5918  Drollinger  Milton Othell  4 Apr 1902  30 Mar 1974  Burial: Payson City Cemetery
Plot: Blk 24 lot 18 pos 7
Payson, Utah County, Utah, USA

Inscription: DROLLINGER Milton O. Apr. 4, 1902 Mar. 30, 1974 Lucille B. Mar. 10, 1907 Nov. 23, 1994 
tree1 
11662 I10779  Drollinger  Minnie Catherine  21 Feb 1888  31 Mar 1967  She apparently went by "Minnie".

According to her nephew, Richard Leroy Drollinger, she lived all her adult life in Akron, OH. 
tree1 
11663 I10779  Drollinger  Minnie Catherine  21 Feb 1888  31 Mar 1967  Burial: Lakewood Cemetery
Akron, Summit County, Ohio 
tree1 
11664 I4677  Drollinger  Mollie Mary  27 Jun 1858  26 Sep 1902  Birth date from grave stone.  tree1 
11665 I4677  Drollinger  Mollie Mary  27 Jun 1858  26 Sep 1902  Burial: Echo Memorial Cemetery
Echo, Umatilla County, Oregon, USA

Inscription: "CRAYNE" at top of stone.  
tree1 
11666 I4677  Drollinger  Mollie Mary  27 Jun 1858  26 Sep 1902  Oregon, Wills and Probate Records
Name: Mary M Crayne
Probate Date: 20 Sep 1902
Probate Place: Umatilla, Oregon, USA
Inferred Death Year: Abt 1902
Inferred Death Place: Oregon, USA
Table of Contents 136 images
Administration Papers 1-6
Will Papers 7-9
Administration Papers 10-14
Cover Page 15
Administration Papers 16-48
Order Papers 49-70
Administration Papers 71-81
Will Papers 82-83
Administration Papers 84-136

The following inscription below is engraved on their daughter, Mabel's headstone, no doubt at their own request. As you can see, Mary identifies herself as "Mollie M. Crayne". In all the other documents I have seen she either identifies herself or is referred to as "Mary". Due to the solemnity, formality and importance of accuracy for the sake of posterity I believe Mary probably chose to use what I believe is the correct order of her birth name on her daughter's headstone. Therefore, I believe Mary's birth name is probably Mollie Mary Drollinger. I believe she simply preferred using her middle name of Mary. Inscription: Dau. of John S. and Mollie M. Crayne "We Loved Her." (David H. Drollinger 19 Jan 2020)

Interestingly, Mary and her family lived just about 30 miles (as the crow flies) south of where I live and grew up in Kennewick, WA. (David H. Drollinger 10 Sep 2017)

1880 United States Federal Census
Name: Mary Crayne
Age: 21
Birth Date: Abt 1859
Birthplace: Indiana
Home in 1880: Stanton, Champaign, Illinois, USA
Dwelling Number: 31
Race: White
Gender: Female
Relation to Head of House: Wife
Marital status: Married
Spouse's name: John Crayne
Father's Birthplace: Ohio
Mother's Birthplace: Ohio
Occupation: Keeping House
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age
John Crayne 29
Mary Crayne 21
Mabel Crayne 4/12

1870 United States Federal Census
Name: Mary Drvellinger
[Mary Drollinger]
Age in 1870: 11
Birth Year: abt 1859
Birthplace: Indiana
Dwelling Number: 116
Home in 1870: Sugar Creek, Montgomery, Indiana
Race: White
Gender: Female
Post Office: Darlington
Occupation: At School
Attended School: Y
Inferred Father: A Drvellinger
Inferred Mother: Rebecca A Drvellinger
Household Members:
Name Age
A Drvellinger 53
Rebecca A Drvellinger 43
Marcus Drvellinger 19
Ambros Drvellinger 17
Mary Drvellinger 11 
tree1 
11667 I12794               
11668 I12794               
11669 I14918               
11670 I15243  Drollinger  Morton   20 Mar 1871  12 Jul 1952  Pension file of father lists wife by maiden name, living children and dates of birth; Elsie M., Morton, Bertha A., Harry F., Bessie E., Claud R., Gracie and Guy. Date of statement 4 Aug 1898

1910 United States Federal Census
Name: Mort Drollinger
[Morton Drollinger]
Age in 1910: 39
Birth Date: 1871
[1871]
Birthplace: Indiana
Home in 1910: Cain, Fountain, Indiana, USA
Race: White
Gender: Male
Relation to Head of House: Head
Marital Status: Married
Spouse's Name: Eva Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Name: Lida M Lightle
Mother's Birthplace: Indiana
Native Tongue: English
Occupation: Farmer
Industry: General Farm
Employer, Employee or Other: Own Account
Home Owned or Rented: Rent
Farm or House: Farm
Able to read: Yes
Able to Write: Yes
Years Married: 7
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members Age Relationship
Mort Drollinger 39 Head
Eva Drollinger 39 Wife
Anna Robertson 16 Step Daughter
William Drollinger 12 Son
Lida M Lightle 71 Mother-in-law
Thomas Fenton 36 Brother

1920 United States Federal Census
Name: Mort Brollinger [Drollinger]
Age: 49
Birth Year: abt 1871
Birthplace: Indiana
Home in 1920: Danville Ward 6, Vermilion, Illinois
Street: Williams St
House Number: 515
Residence Date: 1920
Race: White
Gender: Male
Relation to Head of House: Head
Marital Status: Married
Spouse's Name: Eva Brollinger
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Birthplace: Indiana
Able to Speak English: Yes
Occupation: Carpenter Helper
Industry: Steam Railroad Shops
Employment Field: Wage or Salary
Home Owned or Rented: Owned
Home Free or Mortgaged: Mortgaged
Able to read: Yes
Able to Write: Yes
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members Age Relationship
Mort Brollinger 49 Head
Eva Brollinger 53 Wife
William Trinkle 22 Stepson (Step Son)

1930 United States Federal Census
Name: Morton Drollinger
Birth Year: abt 1872
Gender: Male
Race: White
Age in 1930: 58
Birthplace: Indiana
Marital Status: Married
Relation to Head of House: Head
Home in 1930: Danville, Vermilion, Illinois, USA
Map of Home: Danville, Vermilion, Illinois
Street Address: Jewel St
House Number: 612
Dwelling Number: 354
Family Number: 367
Home Owned or Rented: Owned
Home Value: 1500
Radio Set: No
Lives on Farm: No
Age at First Marriage: 31
Attended School: No
Able to Read and Write: Yes
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Birthplace: Indiana
Able to Speak English: Yes
Occupation: Carpenter
Industry: Steam R R Shops
Class of Worker: Wage or salary worker
Employment: Yes
Household Members Age Relationship
Morton Drollinger 58 Head
Eva Drollinger 62 Wife 
tree1 
11671 I15243  Drollinger  Morton   20 Mar 1871  12 Jul 1952  Indiana, U.S., Death Certificates
Name: Mort Drollinger
Gender: Male
Race: White
Age: 81
Marital status: Widowed
Birth Date: 20 Mar 1871
Birth Place: Fountain County
Death Date: 12 Jul 1952
Death Place: Veedersburg, Fountain, Indiana, USA
Father: Daniel Drollinger
Mother: Mary Drollinger

U.S., Social Security Applications and Claims Index
Name: Mort Drollinger
SSN: 707189687
Gender: Male
Race: White
Birth Date: 20 Apr 1871
Birth Place: Veedersburg, Indiana
Father Name: Daniel Drollinger
Mother Name: Mary Keplinger
Type of Claim: Original SSN.
Notes: Mar 1937: Name listed as MORT DROLLINGER 
tree1 
11672 I15243  Drollinger  Morton   20 Mar 1871  12 Jul 1952  Burial: Rockfield Cemetery
Veedersburg, Fountain County, Indiana, USA

Inscription: DROLLINGER Eva M. 1866-1936 Morton 1871-1952 
tree1 
11673 I38934               
11674 I10065               
11675 I10065               
11676 I1189  Drollinger  Nancy  31 Dec 1805    Nancy was born a twin - presumably her twin did not survive.  tree1 
11677 I17262  Drollinger  Nancy Ann  1826  17 Mar 1900  Nancy Catherine was the daughter of William Brown Drollinger (and Catherine Ann Isely; Wm B Drollinger maried four times: #2- Mary McAllister, #3-Nancy Howard, and #4 - unknown to Mrs. Weddington.) Nancy was the granddaughter of Henry Drollinger (m. Nancy Brown), who was the son of Phillip Drollinger (m. Hannah Kidd). According to Mrs. Weddington, records show Nancy Catherine sometimes as just Nancy and at other times, she was listed as Catherine.

Thanks again for the information and the rapid response,

Marion Stoup Russell
Today, I found your September 12, 1996 family-search listing for Drollinger - Trollinger - Trullinger. Some years ago (1979), I corresponded briefly with Mrs. Clyde A. Weddington of Peoria, Ill. She was the granddaughter of Mary Jane Drollinger, who was the daughter of William B. Drollinger and Catherine Ann Isely. Mrs. Weddington wrote that two of my ancestors were married to Drollingers: Cathrine Ann Stoup (married Henry Drollinger, Jr and Andrew Jackson Stoup (married Nancy Catherine Drollinger). Mrs. Weddington indicated that Andrew J.'s father died 9/18/78 and was buried in Oak Grove Cemetery in Covington. I am seeking information on the senior Andrew Stoup and his parents. Should you have any information, I would like to hear from you. If you are interested in copies of Mrs. Weddington's letters, I would be happy to send them.
Marion Russell - Downey, Ca.
Marion Russell"

1850 United States Federal Census
Name: Nancy A Drulinger
Age: 24
Birth Year: abt 1826
Birthplace: Ohio
Home in 1850: Wabash, Fountain, Indiana
Gender: Female
Family Number: 531  
tree1 
11678 I17262  Drollinger  Nancy Ann  1826  17 Mar 1900  1850 census  tree1 
11679 I17262  Drollinger  Nancy Ann  1826  17 Mar 1900  Indiana, Death Certificates
Name: Nancy Ann Stoup
[Nancy Ann Drullinger]
Gender: Female
Race: White
Age: 74
Birth Date: abt 1826
Birth Place: Fountain Co
Death Date: 17 Mar 1900
Death Place: Covington, Fountain, Indiana, USA
Marital Status: Married
Father: Henry Drullinger
Mother: Nancy A Drullinger 
tree1 
11680 I17262  Drollinger  Nancy Ann  1826  17 Mar 1900  Burial: Coal Creek Cemetery
Coal Creek, Fountain County, Indiana, USA

Note: No Stone 
tree1 
11681 I13685               
11682 I2207  Drollinger  Nancy Graham  22 Mar 1927  24 Feb 2005  (excerpt from Gordon L. Drollinger email to me)
From: Gdrollinger@aol.com
To: ddrollinger@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:06:14 EST
Subject: Re: (no subject)

Dear Dave
I lost contact with Nancy as a few years back the xmas card came back so I figured she had died then. I was actually looking at Washington Drollingers and must have hit WV instead. Her husband Leroy was also a fighter pilot in WWII, shot down and burned. He used to carry a half dollar and walk it thru his fingers to keep them supple. He was a lawyer and early on found where gg grandpa ran afoul of the law in Butler County PA.
G man
(Note, Gordon no doubt brought this to my attention because he knows my Dad, Lynn Howard Drollinger was also WWII fighter pilot) (David H. Drollinger 9 Mar 2005) 
tree1 
11683 I2207  Drollinger  Nancy Graham  22 Mar 1927  24 Feb 2005  BRIDGEPORT -- Nancy D. Perry, age 77, of Maplewood Dr., Bridgeport, formerly of West Shannon Road, Bridgeport, passed away Thursday morning, February 24, 2005 at her residence.

She was born March 22, 1927 in Pittsburgh, PA, a daughter of the late Adolph W. and Marie Graham Drollinger.

Nancy is survived by her husband, Leroy F. Perry, whom she married August 12, 1949. She is also survived by one daughter, April M. Hinkle of Maple Lake; two grandsons, Sgt. William L. Hinkle and his fiance'e Nathalie Keown of Fayetteville, NC, and Brandon J. Hinkle of Maple Lake; two cousins, Eleanor Murphy of Mt. Lebanon, PA and Jenny Blackmore of Indiatlantic, FL.

Nancy graduated from the University of Pittsburgh with a degree in education. She formerly was a member of the Governor Johnson Garden Club and the Bridgeport Country Club. She was a member of the Bridgeport Presbyterian Church. Nancy enjoyed playing bridge, reading and spending time in Ocean City, NJ.

Friends will be received at Burnside Funeral Home, 607 S. Virginia Ave., Bridgeport from 4-8 p.m. Sunday, February 26, 2005. A funeral service will be held at 11 a.m. Monday in the funeral home, with Reverend Gary McGrew presiding. Interment will follow in the Bridgeport Cemetery.

In lieu of flowers, memorial donations may be made to the Bridgeport Presbyterian Church, 1 John Calvin Drive, Bridgeport, WV 26330.

Burnside Funeral Home, 607 S. Virginia Ave., Bridgeport is assisting the family of Nancy D. Perry with her funeral arrangements. 
tree1 
11684 I2207  Drollinger  Nancy Graham  22 Mar 1927  24 Feb 2005  Ref her obit  tree1 
11685 I45490               
11686 I3165  Drollinger  Nathan Lucas "Nate"  17 Jan 1873  17 Dec 1928  Note! Ref Nathan's wife's record for more information.

1900 United States Federal Census
about Nathan Drollinger
Name: Nathan Drollinger
Age: 28
Birth Date: Jan 1872
Birthplace: Indiana
Home in 1900: Mill Creek, Fountain, Indiana [Fountain]
Race: White
Gender: Male
Relation to Head of House: Son
Marital Status: Single
Father's Name: Samuel Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Birthplace: Indiana
Household Members:
Name Age
Samuel Drollinger 70
Nathan Drollinger 28
Burt Drollinger 24
Florence Drollinger 17
Fred Drollinger 13

1910 United States Federal Census
about Nathan Dullinger
Name: Nathan Dullinger [Nathan Drollinger]
Age in 1910: 38
Birth Year: 1872
Birthplace: Indiana
Home in 1910: Millcreek, Fountain, Indiana
Race: White
Gender: Male
Relation to Head of House: Head
Marital Status: Married
Spouse's Name: Grace Dullinger
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Birthplace: Indiana

1920 United States Federal Census
about Nathen S Drollinger
Name: Nathen S Drollinger [Nathan Drollinger] [Walter B Drollinger]
Age: 48
Birth Year: abt 1872
Birthplace: Indiana
Home in 1920: Millcreek, Fountain, Indiana
Race: White
Gender: Male
Relation to Head of House: Head
Marital Status: Married
Spouse's Name: Grace A Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Indiana
Mother's Birthplace: Indiana
Home owned: Own
Able to read: Yes
Able to Write: Yes
Household Members:
Name Age
Nathen S Drollinger 48
Grace A Drollinger 35
Mildred Drollinger 8  
tree1 
11687 I3165  Drollinger  Nathan Lucas "Nate"  17 Jan 1873  17 Dec 1928  Indiana, Death Certificates
Name: Nathan Lueas Drallinger
[Nathan Lucas Drollinger]
Gender: Male
Race: White
Age: 55
Birth Date: 17 Jan 1873
Birth Place: Indiana
Death Date: 18 Dec 1928
Death Place: Millcreek, Fountain, Indiana, USA
Marital Status: Married
Spouse: Anna Grace Drallinger
Father: Samuel Drallinger
Mother: Mary Ann Jones
Informant Mrs. Grace Drollinger 
tree1 
11688 I3165  Drollinger  Nathan Lucas "Nate"  17 Jan 1873  17 Dec 1928  Burial: Bonebrake Cemetery (Row 1)
Veedersburg, Fountain County, Indiana, USA

Inscription: DROLLINGER Grace Jan. 17, 1885 Apr. 18, 1971 Nathan L. Jan. 17, 1873 Dec. 17, 1928

Note: Shares stone with wife 
tree1 
11689 I3339  Drollinger  Nathan Paul  5 Apr 1920  8 May 1994  U.S. World War II Army Enlistment Records
Name: Nathan P Drollinger
Birth Year: 1920
Race: White, citizen
Nativity State or Country: Indiana
State: Indiana
County or City: Fountain
Enlistment Date: 15 Jan 1943
Enlistment State: Indiana
Enlistment City: Indianapolis
Branch: Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
Branch Code: Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
Grade: Private
Grade Code: Private
Term of Enlistment: Enlistment for the duration of the War or other emergency, plus six months, subject to the discretion of the President or otherwise according to law
Component: Selectees (Enlisted Men)
Source: Civil Life
Education: 2 years of college
Civil Occupation: Geographer
Marital Status: Married
Height: 68
Weight: 156

Name: Nathan P Drollinger
Gender: Male
Birth Date: 5 Apr 1920
Death Date: 8 May 1994
SSN: 309187917
Enlistment Date 1: 11 Jan 1943
Release Date 1: 5 Jun 1943

Ronald E. Elberger, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Conrad G. Harvey, Crawfordsville, Ind., for defendants-appellees.

Before FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge,* and WHELAN, District Judge.**

FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge.

Rosanna Drollinger brought this civil rights action challenging certain conditions of her state court probation, asking the district court to enjoin their enforcement and to declare them in violation of various provisions of the Constitution. Nathan Drollinger, Rosanna's father-in-law, joined the suit alleging that the terms of Rosanna's probation also violated his interests protected by the Constitution. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim for which the court could grant relief, specifically holding that Rosanna's action could only be brought as a habeas corpus suit, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), and that she has failed to exhaust her state court remedies.

In addition, the court found that since the defendants, Thomas K. Milligan, Judge of the Montgomery (Indiana) Circuit Court, and D. O. Dulin, Chief Probation Officer of the Montgomery Circuit Court, were sued in their official capacities they did not qualify as "persons" against whom a civil rights action can be brought. Finally, the court ruled that Nathan Drollinger lacked the necessary standing to challenge the conditions of Rosanna's probation, and therefore, could not bring this action. Both Nathan and Rosanna have appealed from the order. On motion, this court enjoined the enforcement of certain of these terms and conditions of probation pending the appeal.

* Rosanna Drollinger pled guilty to a charge of uttering a forged instrument. Subsequent to the plea, the Indiana trial judge, the defendant in this case, placed the plaintiff on probation for five years, requiring that she adhere to a series of conditions. On May 3, 1975 the plaintiff signed an acknowledgement agreeing to the listed "terms and conditions of her probation."1

The plaintiff is specifically challenging the conditions of her probation that (1) restrict her ability to share her living quarters with another person; (2) require her to support both herself and her daughter, Stephanie, only from what she earns from her employment at the Air Force Recruiting Office; (3) forbid her from accepting any gifts; (4) prohibit her from using Nathan Drollinger's home as a place where Roger Drollinger, Rosanna's ex-husband, may pick up and leave Stephanie in the course of exercising his visitation rights; (5) forbid her from associating with the other plaintiff, Nathan Drollinger, or any other member of the Roger Drollinger or Jeff Reed families; (6) impose 8:00 P.M. curfew upon her; (7) caution her to behave in a manner that would not cause anyone to question that she is violating the law; and (8) require her to attend the church of her choice regularly. Nathan Drollinger objects to those provisions of Rosanna's probation which restrict his ability to associate with Rosanna and Stephanie. Both Rosanna and Nathan seek to enjoin the enforcement of these provisions on the grounds that they violate certain of their interests secured by the Constitution.

II

On appeal plaintiffs argue that the district court erred in dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim. They contend that since they are challenging the conditions of probation, rather than its duration, their complaint properly states a claim under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Implicit in their argument is the position that the offensive terms of probation do not define the perimeters of her confinement, and thereby their elimination would not set her free, the traditional remedy sought in a petition for habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254.

With regard to Rosanna's claims, we are satisfied that they must properly be brought by means of a petition for habeas corpus. We are bolstered in this finding first by the fact that the "terms and conditions" of probation place Rosanna "in custody" within the meaning of the federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c). See Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 , 243, 83 S.Ct. 373, 9 L.Ed.2d 285 (1963); Hensley v. Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345 , 351, 93 S.Ct. 1571, 36 L.Ed.2d 294 (1973). In Jones, supra, the Supreme Court held that the petitioner-parolee was sufficiently in the custody of his parole board to permit him to proceed under the habeas corpus statute to challenge his conviction for larceny. 371 U.S. at 243, 83 S.Ct. at 377. The Court found that even though the " . . . petitioner's parole releases him from immediate physical imprisonment, it imposes conditions which significantly confine and restrain his freedom; this is enough to keep him in the 'custody' of the members of the . . . (p)arole (b)oard within the meaning of the habeas corpus statute." The parole order required the petitioner, for example, to visit his parole officer, "keep good company," work regularly and "live a clean, honest, and temperate life." Failure to meet these conditions might well have resulted in the petitioner's return to prison. Since we can discern no significant difference between the statutes of parole and probation with regard to the question of custody, we find that the appellant, Rosanna Drollinger, has satisfied the jurisdictional prerequisite for a habeas corpus action. See Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 782, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

Having determined that Rosanna is "in custody," we must further consider whether the conditions and terms of her probation are the proper subject of a civil rights suit or petition for habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is the " . . . appropriate remedy for state prisoners attacking the validity of the fact or length of their confinement." Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 , 490, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 1836, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973). Section 1983 provides a more general remedy for a plaintiff to bring suit for a violation of his civil rights by a person acting under "color of state law." In the prison context this remedy has been ruled to be appropriate when an inmate challenges the conditions of prison life, but not the fact or duration of his confinement.2 Id., at 499, 93 S.Ct. 1827.

The appellants' constitutional challenge to the conditions and terms of Rosanna's probation may at first glance appear an appropriate subject matter for a § 1983 suit. A prisoner, for example, who is denied access to certain religious publications or legal materials may bring suit under § 1983 for violation of his interests protected by the Constitution. Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 , 84 S.Ct. 1733, 12 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1964); Houghton v. Shafer, 392 U.S. 639 , 88 S.Ct. 2119, 20 L.Ed.2d 1319 (1968). However, the nature of custody while in prison differs significantly from that experienced while on probation. For Rosanna Drollinger the terms of her custody encompass not only the length of time she must spend on probation, but also the specific activities of her daily routine. Because probation is by its nature less confining than incarceration, the distinction between the fact of confinement and the conditions thereof is necessarily blurred. The elimination or substitution, for example, of one of the conditions of Rosanna's probation would free her substantially from her confinement; figuratively speaking, one of the "bars" would be removed from her cell. The release from such custody, even if only partial, is the traditional function of the writ of habeas corpus. Preiser, supra, 411 U.S. at 484, 93 S.Ct. 1827. Cf. Billiteri v. United States Bd. of Parole, 541 F.2d 938 , 947 (2d Cir. 1976). Therefore, Rosanna must proceed by means of a petition for habeas corpus, a cause of action which initially requires the petitioner to exhaust her available state court remedies.3 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , 434-35, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963).

Additionally, the distinction between the conditions and fact of confinement as set forth in Preiser is not entirely applicable in the probation context to determine whether a § 1983 suit or an habeas action is appropriate. Our analysis of the Indiana statutes authorizing the granting of probation demonstrates, however, that the plaintiff is in this suit challenging the sentence of the trial court, clearly the proper subject matter for a habeas corpus action. The granting of probation is a discretionary act, Sutton v. State of Indiana, 244 Ind. 368, 371, 191 N.E.2d 104 (1963), and in effect is an alternative to imprisonment. In placing a defendant on probation the trial court is required to impose conditions concerning the manner in which the defendant must conduct himself. Burns Ind.Stat., 1956 Replacement, § 9-2210. The court may revoke the defendant's probation if any of these conditions are violated, thereby ordering the execution of the previous judgment and causing the confinement of the defendant according to the original sentence. Sutton, supra, at 372, 191 N.E.2d 104. No appeal is permitted from the order revoking probation. Id. Rosanna Drollinger's challenge to the conditions of her probation is, therefore, an attack on the sentence of the trial court. She is seeking release from at least part of that sentence, an attempt to enlarge the scope of her "conditional liberty." Cf. Morrisey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 480, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). Habeas corpus, as we have already noted, is the appropriate remedy for a defendant seeking release from custody or expansion of the perimeters of his confinement. Rosanna Drollinger's constitutional challenge to the conditions and terms of probation is an attempt to obtain such relief, and therefore, must be brought as a petition for habeas corpus.

III

We view Nathan Drollinger's claim for relief differently. As we understand this claim, Nathan Drollinger alleges that the defendants, by restricting his ability to visit or associate with Rosanna Drollinger, and her daughter, Stephanie, have violated his rights protected by the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Nathan, unlike Rosanna, is not in custody, nor, since he was not convicted of a criminal offense, is he subject to the authority of the sentencing court. See, Burns Ind.Stat., 1956 Replacement, §§ 9-2201, 9-2209. His suit is a challenge only to those terms and conditions of Rosanna's probation which limit the exercise of his constitutionally protected rights. Since he is not in custody, nor was he a defendant in the criminal proceedings, he cannot seek relief through habeas corpus and may not be able to go forward with a direct appeal.4 His suit, therefore, because of the nature of the relief it is seeking, and because of the possible closing off of other forms of relief, is properly brought as a civil rights action.

The district court found, however, that Nathan lacked the requisite standing to challenge the terms of Rosanna's probation and that the defendants did not constitute "persons" within the meaning of § 1983. Nathan's claim is based on an alleged deprivation of his constitutional interests which occurred as a result of the terms of Rosanna Drollinger's probation. We have no difficulty in finding that Nathan has alleged "such a 'personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.' Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 , 204 (82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663) (1962), as to ensure that 'the dispute sought to be adjudicated will be presented in an adversary context and in a form historically viewed as capable of judicial resolution.' Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 , 101 (88 S.Ct. 1942, 1953, 20 L.Ed.2d 947) (1968)." Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 1364, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972). Nathan has alleged that, by the terms of Rosanna's probation, he is denied the ability to exercise his right to associate with his granddaughter, Stephanie Drollinger. He claims that he is willing and able to provide a home for Stephanie, but that the trial court has prohibited Rosanna from leaving Stephanie at Nathan's home for any period of time. These allegations, read in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, demonstrate that Nathan has suffered an injury which allows him as a threshhold matter to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal court. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 , 498-500, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975). See also, Mulqueeny v. National Commission on the Observance of International Women's Year, 1975, 549 F.2d 1115 at 1120 (7th Cir. 1977).

We also disagree with the district court's finding that the defendants are not "persons" within the meaning of § 1983. State officers acting under color of state authority are properly "persons" who may be defendants in a civil rights suit. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, at 172, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492. Our court has held in numerous cases that judges, as well as officers of the court, are not immune from § 1983 suits seeking equitable relief, and, therefore, has found that complaints charging them as defendants sufficiently state a cause of action. Jacobson v. Schaefer, 441 F.2d 127 , 129 (7th Cir. 1971); Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389 , 408 (7th Cir. 1972), reversed on other grounds sub nom., O'Shea v. Littleton, 414 U.S. 488 , 94 S.Ct. 669, 38 L.Ed.2d 674 (1974). Cf. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 , 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967).

Turning our attention to the merits of Nathan's complaint, we recognize that plaintiff's claim of a deprivation by the state of his constitutionally protected interest in the nurturing and development of a child or grandchild is actionable under § 1983. The interest in the custody and care of a child by his family has been deemed "essential" and has been granted paramount importance within our constitutional framework. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 651, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 , 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923). This interest, which is rooted in the right of privacy, Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 495, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965), involves the freedom to make " . . . certain kinds of important decisions." Whalen v. Roe, --- U.S. ----, ----, 97 S.Ct. 869, 51 L.Ed.2d 64 (1977). These decisions may involve a broad range of marital, sexual and familial relationships. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1817, 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1967); Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965).

The terms and conditions of Rosanna's probation seriously limit Nathan's freedom to care for his granddaughter.5 This basic interest in the integrity of the family unit has been afforded the protection of due process of law.6 Meyer, supra, 262 U.S. at 399, 43 S.Ct. 625. Circumscription of this right must therefore be preceded ". . . by notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case." Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306 , 313, 70 S.Ct. 652, 657, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950). Even then, the state can restrict the exercise of this right by family members only if it can demonstrate that its interest in limiting family privacy is a ". . . countervailing . . . (one) . . . of overriding significance." See Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 , 377, 91 S.Ct. 780, 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971). Otherwise, the sentencing court, through its discretionary power to grant probation, may deny some family members, who are not specifically subject to the power of the court, their fundamental right to care for other family members. Stanley, supra, at 657-65, 92 S.Ct. 1208.

In this case the state may be able to show that Rosanna and Stephanie Drollinger must be sheltered in order to protect them from the criminal enterprises of other family members. Such separation must be reasonably limited to those members of the family who are likely to cause them harm. Due process requires, however, that the state provide a hearing in which those family members, who are not defendants in the criminal proceeding but whose privacy interests are being impaired, will have the opportunity to respond to the state's reasons for limiting their civil right to care for other members of the family.

For the reasons stated above, we affirm the judgment of the district court regarding Rosanna Drollinger, but reverse and remand concerning Nathan Drollinger's claim, and, assuming that the state has not afforded Nathan a hearing, we instruct the district court to enjoin the enforcement of the terms and conditions of probation which affect Nathan Drollinger's right to care for his granddaughter. This injunction will remain in effect until such time that the state provides the necessary hearing.

* Senior Circuit Judge John S. Hastings participated in oral argument and participated in the conference of the court, but died before this opinion was submitted to him for approval

** District Judge Francis C. Whelan of the District Court for the Central District of California is sitting by designation

1 The terms and conditions of Rosanna Drollinger's probation included the following:

(1) That she is to continue her employment with the Air Force Recruiting Office. That she is not to quit or change employment without getting prior approval from the probation officer or his designee.

(2) That when the time comes for her to go to school, if all conditions are right, she is to get the prior approval of the probation officer before she quits her job to go to school.

(3) That she is to continue to live at her current place of residence at 208 1/2 West Chestnut Street, Crawfordsville, and that she is to live there with her daughter only, and no other person is to live there with them. She is not to change her place of residence without the approval of the probation officer.

(4) That from her employment she is to support herself entirely. She is to pay the fine and costs imposed in this matter, and that she is to make restitution for the checks which were passed, or her share thereof as determined by the probation officer. She is also to reimburse Montgomery County the amount allowed as fees for the attorney who was appointed by the court to represent her in this matter. With the help of the probation officer, she is to work out a budget, taking into consideration her income and expenses, and she is to pay these obligations. In this connection, she is not to accept any gifts, gratuities or hand-outs from anyone to help with these obligations, they are to be paid by the defendant alone from her earnings.

(5) Inasmuch as one Jeff Reed and Roger Drollinger may have had something to do with this, she is not to associate with either one of such individuals, or any member of the family of either such person. In that connection, since Roger Drollinger is the father of her daughter, such visitation is to be arranged without the defendant seeing or contacting Roger Drollinger and arrangements should be made for a place to leave the daughter of Mr. Drollinger to pick her up and leave her after his visitation has ended. The residence of Roger Drollinger's parents and defendant's residence are not to be such a place where Roger Drollinger may pick up and leave the child.

(6) That she is to cooperate to the fullest extent with investigating officers or authorities in connection with this crime or any other crime of which she has knowledge which have taken place.

(7) That she is to seek counseling through the probation officer to assist her in making a transition from being dependent on others to being independent, and self-supporting.

(8) That she is to be in her place of residence by 8:00 P.M. and she is not to leave before 6:00 A.M. with the following exceptions: Employment keeps her out beyond 8:00 P.M.; schooling requires that she be out or if there should be an emergency with regard to the child. All exceptions to this curfew are granted with the provision that she go directly to and return from such school, employment or emergency.

(9) That she is to conduct herself in such a manner as not to cause anyone to question whether or not she is violating the law, and that includes not being charged or accused of violating the law. This goes to the mental attitude toward the law as well as the act itself.

(10) That she is to be in contact with the probation officer or his designee at such times as the probation officer may direct, and she is to follow his instructions and directions with regard to the terms of probation.

(11) That she is to attend the church of her choice regularly.

2 Habeas corpus may be a parallel remedy with which a prisoner may challenge prison conditions. Preiser, infra, at 499, 93 S.Ct. 1827

3 The Indiana Supreme Court has held that "(i)n event the defendant accepts the benefits of a suspended sentence and goes at liberty under the terms of the probation, he may not thereafter appeal." State ex rel. Wilson v. Lowdermilk, 245 Ind. 93, 101, 195 N.E.2d 476 (1964). Other post-conviction relief may be available to the plaintiff, Rosanna Drollinger. See, Indiana Rules of Procedure for Post Conviction Remedies, Rule P.C. 1. This rule prohibiting appeal from an order revoking probation has apparently been rescinded by newly enacted statutes which are effective July 1, 1977. Burns Ind.Stat.Ann. (Code Edition), § 35-7-2-1 (1975)

4 We recognize that the principles of comity and federalism would ordinarily prohibit a federal court from enjoining a state criminal proceeding. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 43-45, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). However, Nathan Drollinger was not a defendant in the state criminal trial and therefore Younger is not directly applicable. Cf. Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 , n. 9, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975); Juidice v. Vail, --- U.S. ----, ----, 97 S.Ct. 1211, 51 L.Ed.2d 376 (1977). Nathan's ability to obtain relief in the state court is not clear. Because Nathan is not a defendant in the state court the threat to his federally protected rights appears to be " . . . one that cannot be eliminated by his defense against a single criminal prosecution." 401 U.S. at 46, 91 S.Ct. at 751. Even applying the principles articulated in Younger, therefore, Nathan will suffer the type of "irreparable" injury which the federal courts can remedy through the issuance of an injunction. Id

5 Insofar as Nathan argues that he is injured by being denied the right to associate with Rosanna, we are unable to find that he has standing to challenge this alleged deprivation. The terms of probation which intend to circumscribe Rosanna's conduct are personal to Rosanna, even though they may affect the rights of others as well. This is distinguishable from the terms of probation which relate to Stephanie's and Nathan's conduct, and only tangentially affect Rosanna. See discussion, infra

6 The nuclear family has traditionally constituted the unit afforded the protection of due process. We see no reason, however, not to extend this guaranty to the grandfather-grandchild relationship 
tree1 
11690 I3339  Drollinger  Nathan Paul  5 Apr 1920  8 May 1994  Birth date from grave stone.  tree1 
11691 I3339  Drollinger  Nathan Paul  5 Apr 1920  8 May 1994  Nathan Drollinger April 5, 1920 - May 8, 1994
Waynetown- 74, o Rt 1, Waynetown, died at 12:44 Sunday in Culver Union Hospital.
Mr Drollinger was a retired farmer and a veteran of World War II. He was a member of Yeddo Baptist Church.
He was bron April 3, 1920, in Millcreek Township of Fountain County, Indiana to Nathan and Grace Elmore Drollinger. He married Gwendolyn Ellis Nov 29, 1942. She survives.
Also surviving are two daughters, Janice Ellis of Phoenix and Joyce Lighty of rural Veedersburg; a son, Roger of Michigan City, Indiana; a sister Mildred Garrison of Sandy Springs, Georgia; 11 grandchildren and five great grandchildren. He was preceded in death by a daughter, Paula.
Funeral services are scheduled for 10:30 am Wednesday in the Woodrow Funeral Home at Kingman with the Rev Robert Grider officiating. Burial will be in Centennial Cemetery east of Yeddo. Friends may call 4-8 pm today at the funeral home.
[Obituary out of the Crawfordsville Journal Review 10 May 1994 pg 2)

Social Security Death Index
Name: Nathan P. Drollinger
SSN: 309-18-7917
Last Residence: 47990 Waynetown, Montgomery, Indiana, United States of America
Born: 5 Apr 1920
Died: 8 May 1994
State (Year) SSN issued: Indiana (Before 1951) 
tree1 
11692 I3339  Drollinger  Nathan Paul  5 Apr 1920  8 May 1994  Burial: Centennial Cemetery
Yeddo, Fountain County, Indiana, USA

Inscription: DROLLINGER Gwendolyn M. July 15, 1925 Feb. 8, 2008 Nathan Paul Apr. 5, 1920 May 8, 1994 Parents of Janice K. - Paula Gwen - Joyce E. - Roger Clay 
tree1 
11693 I9860  Drollinger  Nellie Mae "Nell"  27 Jan 1917  11 Aug 1994  According to Richard Leroy "Ricky" Drollinger Jr., Nellie Mae Drollinger is a genealogist. (David H. Drollinger)

Nellie Mae Drollinger
in the U.S., Social Security Applications and Claims Index, 1936-2007
Name: Nellie Mae Drollinger
[Nellie M Windous]
[Nell Windous]
Gender: Female
Race: White
Birth Date: 27 Jan 1917
Birth Place: Marion, Ohio
Death Date: Aug 1994
Father:
Elmer F Drollinger
Mother:
Lauraette E Gardner
SSN: 530034049
Notes: Jun 1937: Name listed as NELLIE MAE DROLLINGER; Jan 1944: Name listed as NELLIE M WINDOUS; 15 Sep 1994: Name listed as NELL WINDOUS

 
tree1 
11694 I9860  Drollinger  Nellie Mae "Nell"  27 Jan 1917  11 Aug 1994  Ohio, U.S., Birth Index
Name: Unnamed Dralinger
Birth Date: 27 Jan 1917
Birth Place: Ohio, USA
Certificate Number: 1917005265 
tree1 
11695 I9860  Drollinger  Nellie Mae "Nell"  27 Jan 1917  11 Aug 1994  Social Security Death Index
Name: Nell Windous
SSN: 530-03-4049
Last Residence: 89301 Ely, White Pine, Nevada, United States of America
Born: 27 Jan 1917
Died: Aug 1994
State (Year) SSN issued: Nevada (Before 1951) 
tree1 
11696 I8702  Drollinger  Nellie P.  10 Aug 1879  9 Sep 1969  Nellie never married. Nellie kept everything including the smallest scraps of fabric. She would reuse Christmas cards. As told to me by Sue Chavey who is the daughter of Franklin Jefferson Pacey who is the son of Mearl Isola Myer during our telephone conversation today, 14 Oct 2019. (David H. Drollinger)

1920 census age 40 teacher country school with parents. 
tree1 
11697 I8702  Drollinger  Nellie P.  10 Aug 1879  9 Sep 1969  Social Security Death Index
Name: Nellie Drollinger
SSN: 510-50-1648
Last Residence: 66748 Humboldt, Allen, Kansas, United States of America
Born: 10 Aug 1879
Died: Sep 1969
State (Year) SSN issued: Kansas (1963) 
tree1 
11698 I8702  Drollinger  Nellie P.  10 Aug 1879  9 Sep 1969  Burial: Mount Hope Cemetery
Plot: Sec A Lot 45 Sp 1
Humboldt Allen County, Kansas, USA 
tree1 
11699 I11707  Drollinger  Nellie P. "Nell"  1 Aug 1897  15 Mar 1980  Nell's middle name may be Philippine in honor of her mother's mother.

Nell never married according to Richard Lemar Drollinger Sr.

1930 United States Federal Census
Name: Nelle P Drollinger
Birth Year: abt 1898
Gender: Female
Race: White
Birthplace: Ohio
Marital Status: Single
Relation to Head of House: Daughter
Home in 1930: Marion, Marion, Ohio
Street address: Pearl Street
Ward of City: Fifth Part of
House Number in Cities or Towns: 512
Dwelling Number: 197
Family Number: 205
Attended School: No
Able to Read and Write: Yes
Father's Birthplace: Ohio
Mother's Birthplace: Germany
Able to Speak English: Yes
Occupation: Weaver
Industry: Silh Mill
Class of Worker: Wage or salary worker
Employment: Yes

1920 United States Federal Census
Name: Nellie Drollinger
Age: 22
Birth Year: abt 1898
Birthplace: Ohio
Home in 1920: Marion Ward 3, Marion, Ohio
Street: Pearl Street
Race: White
Gender: Female
Relation to Head of House: Daughter
Marital Status: Single
Father's name: Lewis H Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Ohio
Mother's name: Julia W Drollinger
Mother's Birthplace: Germany
Able to Speak English: Yes
Occupation: Winder
Industry: Silk Mills
Employment Field: Wage or Salary

1910 United States Federal Census
Name: Nellie P Drollinger
Age in 1910: 13
Birth Year: abt 1897
Birthplace: Ohio
Home in 1910: Marion Ward 3, Marion, Ohio
Street: Pearl St
Race: White
Gender: Female
Relation to Head of House: Daughter
Marital Status: Single
Father's name: Louis Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Ohio
Mother's name: Julia Drollinger
Mother's Birthplace: Germany
Native Tongue: English
Attended School: Yes
Able to Read: Yes
Able to Write: Yes

1900 United States Federal Census
Name: Nellie Drollinger
Age: 3
Birth Date: Aug 1896
Birthplace: Ohio
Home in 1900: Marion Ward 3, Marion, Ohio
Race: White
Gender: Female
Relation to Head of House: Daughter
Marital Status: Single
Father's name: Lewis Drollinger
Father's Birthplace: Ohio
Mother's name: Julia Drollinger 
tree1 
11700 I11707  Drollinger  Nellie P. "Nell"  1 Aug 1897  15 Mar 1980  Ohio, Births and Christenings Index
Name: Nellie Drollinger
Gender: Female
Birth Date: 1 Aug 1897
Birth Place: Marion, Marion, Ohio
Father: Lewis Drollinger
Mother: Julia Mitchael
FHL Film Number: 384336 
tree1 


«Prev «1 ... 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 ... 981» Next»